Buddhist Lessons From A Christian Monk

By: David Xi-Ken Astor 

Some have said that the Christian Trappist monk, Thomas Merton,  is the man with rich wisdom and an everyday mind that was seeking a broad and pluralistic dimension to spirituality who caused the Dalai Lama to come to admire Christianity and it’s history of contemplative thought.  As a Christian Cistercian monk, Catholic priest, a world renowned spiritual guide and teacher of the contemplative life, Thomas Merton (Fr. Lewis) was not your ordinary religious cleric.  In fact, he was agnostic in worldview and philosophically opposed to organized religion of any tradition until later in his twenties when he became spiritually aware.  He was a writer, artist, intellectual, political activist at one time,  and a man of the world.  He was well educated with an over-active curiosity.  He even fathered a child out of wedlock while a student at Cambridge in England before moving to New York and attending Columbia University.  But something was missing in his life; and he was on a path to awakening, even if he was unaware of the potential at the time.  And when it came, it was for him, like being hit by lightening.  It was as immediate as was Alice’s experience with the rabbit hole.  He became one of the most important spiritual writers of the last half of the twentieth century.  And his writing impelled by his monastic life’s interests in the world’s spiritual traditions are recognized as a seminal and continuing catalyst for inter-spiritual dialogue in this twenty-first century.   Thomas Merton was a true ascetic and contemplative that constantly challenged his understanding of a spiritual life as his ego driven self kept getting in the way of finding the true self within.   He died young in Thailand while attending a world conference of monastic leaders in 1968.

Thomas Merton was his own bridge that fill the gap between religious and secular perspectives.  Some believe that he means almost more today to many than he actually did in his lifetime.  And I agree.  He is becoming an iconic figure who models inter-spiritual dialogue for those who are seeking a common ground of respect for the varied ways in which human beings realize the nature of our world.   As you hear me often say, there are many paths up the mountain.  And Merton recognized this early on in his contemplative practice.  He honored a pluralistic and pragmatic worldview when it came to leading a spiritual life.  Perhaps this was made more possible based on how he lived before stepping on a spiritual path.  Consider that he entered the riggers of a Trappist monastic life only six months after he received baptism as an adult.    His introduction to Buddhism set him on the path to find language to express inclusivity and respect among the various monastic traditions, in order to transmit meaningful change to a contemporary audience.  So I wish to explore the lessons that can be found in the way Merton practiced the spiritual dimension of what he came to be awakened to that shaped, and reshaped, his worldview.  And see if you can also find that when we step on a spiritual path, and when we learn to remove the filters that often distort our perspective, we awaken to the common elements we all share as humans seeking the spirit and wonder of this life’s journey.  Discover, like Thomas Merton did, that it does not always come from our own tradition.

Fifty years ago as a young man the Dalai Lima left his homeland and began a new life in India as a refugee.  In general his departure from Tibet and the circumstances that led to it are causes for much regret as he speaks about it.  However, these experiences have also inadvertently provided him personally with many reasons to be grateful too.  He mentions that among these are the many opportunities he has had to become better acquainted with the world’s major religious traditions.  He talks about how he has been welcomed at places of worship throughout the world, and has visited and shared practice at many places of pilgrimage.  But while having this pluralistic experience was important, he talks about the more important experience he has had in meeting spiritual teachers and making friends with them.  The Dalai Lima has written about the lessons he has taken away from these experiences that all the world’s spiritual traditions have similar potential to help us become better human beings.  For centuries, millions of people have found peace of mind in their own religious tradition.  But today we find followers of many faiths sacrificing their own welfare to help others, and to find happiness and human flourishing that is an important goal of all spiritual practices.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under David Xi-Ken Astor

Spiritual Transformation

By: David Xi-Ken Astor, Sensei  曦 肯

Being transformed by experiencing our human nature’s drive to seek the spirit and wonder of our own nature is a rather grand-sounding phrase, but that is what we are engaged in.  And hard work it is too.  There can be pain and weariness, and there are many doubts and questions along the way.  It is not just sitting and thinking, but becoming dynamically aware, sensing with our entire body-mind.  Our zazen posture is a posture of awakening.  It is open and alert; we are aware of our breath as it moves through us.

The word meditation comes from the Latin ‘meditare’, which is the passive form of the verb, meaning “being moved to the center.”  It is not the active form, which is “moving to the center.”  Do you hear the difference?  This center is our own essence.  Sitting after sitting, letting everything drop away, we become more aware of our own personal center.  We become more rooted in it.  This simple act of sitting absolutely still, letting everything go,  has far-reaching effects.  Those of you with a dedicated meditation practice know the intent of what I am expressing, but my words are inadequate to express it completely.

Sitting still is not what some of us may have imagined a practice of spirit to be.  We may think that it involves something more impressive.  But those of us who do it, those of us who are ‘present’ at this moment, know that this is it.  Sitting absolutely still, body AND mind are not separate.  Our state of mind at any given moment becomes clearer in this condition of being present, completely present.  And there is great healing power in this simple act.  Of course we may experience some pain.  The true taste of contemplation really cannot be understood unless we have some challenges.  After our contemplative practice experience begins to develop and mature, we do not find the challenge over whelming.  Our teacher works with us in order for us to learn not to move against it; we do not struggle with it; rather, we simply remain aware of our breath and work to change our condition.  We become aware of what happens when we pay attention to it, and practice with positive intent.

When I begin to work with a new formal student I often ask, “Why did you come to sit?  What is your reason?  Do you have a reason?  What happened in your life that brought you to the cushion?   In essence, “Why are you here?”  And most students say they came because they wanted to have some peace of mind.  As we sit, there is some temporary peacefulness, of course.  But we want to come to a condition of mind that takes us in the beginning through all the circumstances of our life, no matter how difficult.  Then, no matter what happens, there is this quiet, truly peaceful space within.   All of us with a meditation practice has gone though this phase of development.  And still work, at times, to conquer our devils.  So you see, it is an ongoing process, not an event.   And I am so thankful that I have a Dharma Brother to talk these things through with.  Please do not misunderstand.  This does not mean we should inflict anything on ourselves.  It simply means that if issues come up, we let it come, and we let it be our teacher.  Thus, even our personal challenges can be a wonderful teacher for us.  We work to cultivate a beginners-mind.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under David Xi-Ken Astor

Changing Weeds Into Nourishment

By:  David Xi-Ken Astor, Sensei

According to a recent Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life report a growing number of people while not considering themselves as affiliated with any particular religion do not, however, consider themselves as atheists or agnostic either.   The report indicates that one in five American adults now have no religious affiliation.  While some do consider their spiritual interests as agnostic, a larger number have no interest in identifying themselves in any way when it comes to how they identify with their spiritual thoughts.  Pew has been doing this survey for some years now, and they have found that those considering themselves as “non-affiliated” has risen to 19 percent from 15 percent just five years ago.

The number breaks down like this: there are 46 million religiously non-practicing American adults including 13 million self-described atheists or agnostics, and 33 million who don’t identify with any organized religious or spiritual practice.   What is interesting is that two-thirds of those non-practicing individuals do not deny that there is a God, and feel some feeling of a deep spiritual connection with nature.  These people think of themselves as “spiritual but not religious”.   A major factor for this growing trend is the aging of America, where there is a growing number of younger adults that have been raised in non-religious households.  The younger generation is less religious, but yet not totally disconnected from a sense of spiritual thoughts either.  What is interesting to me is that this younger generation are not seekers.  When the researchers ask this generation if they had thoughts that humans have been pondering for centuries about some of the really hard question, they seemed to have little interest beyond immediate interests.
Another interesting trend being reported is that less then half of Americans now identify with any Protestant religion.  So while America is becoming less religious, it is, however, one of the most religious among the developed countries.  While may Americans seem to be dropping out of more organized religious interest, they seem to be changing also how they talk about religion.  Today, we are more comfortable talking about our religious and spiritual beliefs, or disbeliefs, and how we interpret the world around us without any sense of shame or fear of cultural backlash.    It is becoming the new norm.  The one religious group that has remained consistent are the Catholic faithful.  But this group only makes up 21 percent of the religious community.

This growing non-religious community is developing across all income, education, gender, and social class groups.   But the younger generation is not the only segment of our society that is becoming less faith-based associated, many older Americans have increased their numbers too.  Now 21 percent of “generation-X” and 15 percent of baby boomers call themselves unaffiliated.  This growing trend will have unknown impact on future political and social justice issues.  We are seeing cultural transformation taking shape in our lifetime.

As Buddhism in America, and in the West in general, gains cultural authority, and integrates into main-stream acceptability over time, opportunities for alternative spiritual interest based on a different philosophical construct rather than a theological one may attract attention among this group that has turned away from beliefs stuck in the past.  The challenge for Buddhism is to not forget that Buddhism is by its very nature causality based and subject to change and renewal.  We must take Siddhartha’s enlightened experience and put it into contemporary language in order to give it a chance to reflect back to us the modern lesson that science can teach.   Buddhism thrives in this enriched soil of modernity.  It is up to the growing number of American Buddhist teachers now to touch the spiritual nature residing inside all of us in the language that our contemporary society can recognize, and spark the flame waiting to be lit to burn down the weeds obscuring how we can nourish the self within.  This may be what is missing for those growing up in a static religious experience.  It is an uphill struggle for sure, but my experience is that when given a chance to present Buddhist principles to those discouraged by their past religious experience, a different worldview can emerge that just may be the spark that shines light on a new path that is as natural as breathing.   Master Shunryu Suzuki put it this way, “…it is not to difficult to give some philosophical or psychological interpretation of our practice, but that is not enough.  We must have the actual experience of how our weeds change into nourishment.”

Copyright: OEB January 2014

Leave a comment

Filed under David Xi-Ken Astor

A Lesson Contemplating A Contemporary View Of Agnosticism

By: David Xi-Ken Astor, Sensei

I have been ordained as an American Ch’an Buddhist monk, and trained in both the Chinese view of Buddhist principles, as well as influenced by Japanese Zen traditional styles of transmitting the dharma.  My Ch’an root teacher, the Venerable Shi Yong Xiang, was very scholarly in his approach to Buddhist philosophy, as well as teaching the importance science plays in informing us of universal realities, especially life-sciences.   I spent much time in discussing with him, and the other senior formal students, the logic and critical analysis of Buddhist doctrine.   I cherish those moments even today.  I came to understand how reason and my own experiences can form a new worldview based on these Buddhist lessons, both directly from primary sources, and through the legacy material that came down to us over the centuries after the death of Siddhartha Gotama.    What I was not aware of at the time, is just how future change works in this personal transformation.  I thought once I came to an understanding of a specific doctrine, that it became somewhat static.  Boy was I wrong.  The causal universe had some hidden lessons in store for me down the road.

What attracted me to Buddhism as a logical and spiritual path was that it did not rely on simple faith as my Christian one did, but required me to critically evaluate my own conclusions, and the importance of experiential verification.  The Buddha said, “…you should examine my words, and not just accept them because you have faith in me.”  The problem with this honest statement for me was in the reality of working with some of the principle doctrines.  How was I to achieve understanding when some of them were unknowable.  Like rebirth.  Being agnostic about it seemed a cop out.  Obviously in Buddhism there is no such kind of permanent entity that can go from one body to the next.  The principle of impermanence and not-self is very clear on this.  There seemed to be a contradiction in the very basic set of core doctrines.

Japanese Zen does not focus on the notion of rebirth all that much, like do some of the other Buddhist traditions, including Tibetan.  The early Chinese Ch’an practices did specialize on ritual practices associated with notions of how to comfort the dead, some in complex ways.  But anyone that reads both past and contemporary Buddhist literature will encounter the doctrine of rebirth frequently.  Over the centuries various traditions have developed ways to explain rebirth, generally in ways that consider how consciousness survives physical death.  These early dogmas also found ways to explain the continuity of individual karmic actions that come back to confront us as we appear in another universal expression.   A large majority of Buddhists see the idea of rebirth and individual-karma as simply non-negotiable elements of Buddhism.

Right from the beginning, I found a natural acceptance of Buddhist philosophy and practices.  But some of the doctrines when studied from a contemporary perspective became inhibitors.  Maybe because of my past spiritual training, and natural philosophical mind, I did not have a problem with selecting what principles to “set on the back burner” and work with those that had the most meaning for me.  In the first monastery where I studied, this set me apart from most of my follow formal students that took the position that you had to eat everything on the plate.  I spent many hours with my first teacher pursuing scholarly training analyzing the concepts and terminology of Buddhism through the Socratic method (as I did with my root teacher later).   They did not push my reluctance, and sometimes out-right skepticism, but worked to build a solid platform from which to explore deeper topics.  But this one area of Buddhist thought that stems from its pre-Buddhist encounter with  Hinduism was, for me, the elephant-in-the-room.  When I read how eminent masters ask us to accept rebirth it sounded like, “Don’t worry about understanding it, of course it is not obvious, but when you experience deep states of meditation, everything will become very clear for you.”  In other words, it is a mystical spiritual state, beyond normal experience.  There are practices in both Tibetan and Dzogchen traditions that help one to experience knowing this nature of consciousness and how the mind has to arise from a previous moment of mind.   What was interesting to me that after some time studying the Pali Nikaya’s the idea of brain was barely mentioned.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under David Xi-Ken Astor

Our Yearning To Find Meaning In A New Year

By: Ven. David Xi-Ken Shi

Human beings seem unique in their yearning to find meaning.  Dr. Nuland calls it “seeking the spirit and wonder” of this world.  In the morning I open my eyes, look in the mirror, and see someone I call myself.   I look around and observe space and place and I call that my world.  I interact with others and call those my relationships.  And into all of this, I attribute meaning: what does this thought, emotion, situation or event mean?  How do I interpret that meaning to obtain what I want or think I need right now.  Our Buddhist training challenges us to ask the deeper question, the real question: who is this person, what is the  reality of this world the best I can become awakened to it, and how do I live my life without creating suffering?

Sometimes when I see a small child I think how wonderful it would be again to not have to worry about putting a roof over my head, or how to feed myself, or will I continue to have good health, or is this neighborhood safe, what is a mortgage, how much is bathroom tissue, or do others like me?  That was a time of innocence, of protection, and of being close to a warm and safe source, without the stress over the cost of living a life in the real world.  But no longer being a child, we can’t go back.  Those days are over.  The fact is, we can never return to anything, ever.  One moment arises, never to be seen again.

To give up all seeking of past or future, and die to the very self that seeks to return to a more innocent time, is the great challenge of a Buddhist practice.  For Buddhists, we can’t be on the path unless we actively seek the dharma, and yet in that very seeking, inevitably we turn away from the our self as we have come to realize it.

It is not possible to return to a previous state of being, the mutual-causal Universe doesn’t work that way.  Even now when we return home to our parents, we are no longer treated as a child, hopefully anyway.  And this is quite natural.  The parent not paying attention to us like they use to has nothing to do with disregard.  It has nothing do to with not loving us or lack of interest.   It is just that our interaction with them is now in a different moment, with a different set of realities.  Our parents have moved on too.  From a Zen teaching perspective, an old Zen master might say, “At this point the empty sky’s vanished and the iron mountain has crumbled, there is not an inch of ground to stand on.”  In other words, it is a different state of knowing.  The forms of each puzzle piece has been changed, and there relationship to each other take on a different meaning, while the image of the puzzle retains its original nature.   The ground we use to sand on has vanished, NOW is only how we are in this very moment, and it IS our home.

Each of us have had moments in the past where we have visited a new place, taken on a new activity, or met someone for the first time, and we have experienced that it felt very familiar, even like home, or we have know the person for a long time.  What is interesting about these experiences is that we are immediately aware of them.  What were we really experiencing?  What kind of reality were we experiencing that gave rise to that deep sense like we have when we are at home?  What is home?  It’s that place where we feel a special relationship with place, as well as those connected to it, including ourselves.  It is a place we feel loved.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized